U.S.
President Donald Trump accused Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government of
going "beyond a red line" with a poison gas attack on civilians and
said his attitude
toward Syria and Assad had changed, but gave no indication of
how he would respond.
Trump said
the attack, which killed at least 70 people, many of them children,
"crosses many, many lines", an allusion to his predecessor Barack
Obama's threat to topple Assad with air strikes if he used such weapons. His
accusations against Assad put him directly at odds with Moscow, the Syrian's
president principal backer.
"I will
tell you, what happened yesterday is unacceptable to me," Trump told
reporters at a news conference with Jordan's King Abdullah on Wednesday.
"And I
will tell you, it’s already happened that my attitude toward Syria and Assad
has changed very much," though when asked at an earlier meeting whether he
was formulating a new policy on Syria, Trump said: "You'll see."
Vice
President Mike Pence, when asked whether it was time to renew the call for
Assad to be ousted and safe zones be established, told Fox News: "But let
me be clear, all options are on the table," without elaborating.
U.S. officials
rejected Russia's assertion that Syrian rebels were to blame for the attack.
Trump's
comments, which came just a few days after Washington said it was no longer
focused on making Assad leave power, suggested a clash between the Kremlin and
Trump's White House after initial signals of warmer ties. Trump did not mention
Russia in his comments on Wednesday but Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said
it was time for Russia to think carefully about its support for Assad.
Pence said
the time had come for Moscow to "keep the word that they made to see to
the elimination of chemical weapons so that they no longer threaten the people
in that country."
Western
countries, including the United States, blamed Assad's armed forces for the
worst chemical attack in Syria for more than four years.
U.S.
intelligence officials, based on a preliminary assessment, said the deaths were
most likely caused by sarin nerve gas dropped by Syrian aircraft on the town of
Khan Sheikhoun on Tuesday. A senior State Department official said Washington
had not yet ascertained it was sarin.
Moscow
offered an alternative explanation that would shield Assad: that the poison gas
belonged to rebels and had leaked from an insurgent weapons depot hit by Syrian
bombs.
A senior
White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Russian
explanation was not credible. "We don't believe it," the official
said.
The United
States, Britain and France have proposed a draft U.N. Security Council
resolution that would condemn the attack; the Russian Foreign Ministry called
it "unacceptable" and said it was based on "fake
information".
Kremlin
spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow would press its case blaming the rebels and
Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said Russia would veto the draft if
Western nations went to a vote without further consultations, Interfax news
agency reported.
Moscow has
proposed its own draft, TASS news agency quoted a spokesman of Russia's U.N.
mission, Fyodor Strzhizhovsky, as saying on Wednesday.
The U.S.
ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, issued what appeared to be a
threat of unilateral action if Security Council members could not agree.
"When
the United Nations consistently fails in its duty to act collectively, there
are times in the life of states that we are compelled to take our own
action," she told the council, without elaborating.
Trump
described the attack as "horrible" and "unspeakable." He
faulted Obama for failing to carry through on his "red line" threat
and when asked if he had responsibility to respond to the attack, said: "I
now have responsibility".
The new
incident means Trump is faced with same dilemma that faced his predecessor:
whether to openly challenge Moscow and risk deep involvement in a Middle East
war by seeking to punish Assad for using banned weapons, or compromise and
accept the Syrian leader remaining in power at the risk of looking weak.
While some
rebels hailed Trump's statement as an apparent shift in the U.S. position,
others said it was too early to say whether the comments would result in a real
change in policy.
Fares
al-Bayoush, a Free Syrian Army commander, told Reuters: "Today's statement
contains a serious difference from the previous statements, and we expect
positivity ... from the American role.
Others who
declined to be identified said they would wait and see.
Video
uploaded to social media showed civilians sprawled on the ground, some in
convulsions, others lifeless. Rescue workers hose down the limp bodies of small
children, trying to wash away chemicals. People wail and pound on the chests of
victims.
The charity
Medecins Sans Frontieres said one of its hospitals in Syria had treated
patients "with symptoms - dilated pupils, muscle spasms, involuntary
defecation - consistent with exposure to neuro-toxic agents such as
sarin". The World Health Organization also said the symptoms were consistent
with exposure to a nerve agent.
"We're
talking about war crimes," French U.N. Ambassador Francois Delattre told
reporters in New York.
Labib
Nahhas, chief of foreign relations at Ahrar al-Sham, one of the biggest rebel
groups in western Syria, called the Russian statement factually wrong and one
which contradicted witness accounts.
"This
statement provides Assad with the required coverage and protection to continue
his despicable slaughter of the Syrian people," Nahhas told Reuters.
The incident
is the first time U.S. intelligence officials have accused Assad of using sarin
since 2013, when hundreds of people died in an attack on a Damascus suburb. At
that time, Washington said Assad had crossed a "red line" set by
then-President Obama.
Obama threatened
an air campaign to topple Assad but called it off at the last minute when the
Syrian leader agreed to give up his chemical arsenal under a deal brokered by
Moscow, a decision which Trump has long said proved Obama's weakness.
SAME DILEMMA
The Western-drafted
U.N. Security Council resolution condemns the attack and presses Syria to
cooperate with international investigators. Russia has blocked seven
resolutions to protect Assad's government, most recently in February.
Trump's
response to a diplomatic confrontation with Moscow will be closely watched at
home because of accusations by his political opponents that he is too
supportive of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
U.S.
intelligence agencies say Russia intervened in the U.S. presidential election
last year through computer hacking to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. The
FBI and two congressional committees are investigating whether figures from the
Trump campaign colluded with Moscow, which the White House denies.
Trump's
relationship with Russia has deteriorated since the presidential election
campaign, when Trump praised Putin as a strong leader and vowed to improve
relations between the two countries, including a more coordinated effort to
defeat Islamic State in Syria.
But as
Russia has grown more assertive, including interfering in European politics and
deploying missiles in its western Kaliningrad region and a new ground-launched
cruise missile near Volgograd in southern Russia - an apparent violation of the
1987 Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty - relations have cooled, U.S.
officials have said.
The chemical
attack in Idlib province, one of the last major strongholds of rebels, who have
fought since 2011 to topple Assad, complicates diplomatic efforts to end a war
that has killed hundreds of thousands of people and driven half of Syrians from
their homes.
Over the
past several months, Western countries, including the United States, had been
quietly dropping their demands that Assad leave power in any deal to end the
war, accepting that the rebels no longer had the capability to topple him by
force.
The use of
banned chemical weapons would make it harder for the international community to
sign off on any peace deal that does not remove him. Britain and France on
Wednesday renewed their call for Assad to leave power.
*REUTERS*
COUNTER-RESOLUTION

0 Comments