Sen. Claire
McCaskill just brought the Senate closer to a "nuclear" fight over
President Donald Trump's nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
Sen. Claire
McCaskill of Missouri on Friday brought the Senate closer to a
"nuclear" fight over President Donald Trump's nomination of Judge
Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
In a Medium
post published Friday, McCaskill, a moderate Democrat, said she would vote no
on a procedural vote for Gorsuch, indicating that she would join a Democratic
filibuster against the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals judge.
"This is
a really difficult decision for me," McCaskill wrote. "I am not
comfortable with either choice."
"While I
have come to the conclusion that I can’t support Neil Gorsuch for the Supreme
Court — and will vote no on the procedural vote and his confirmation — I remain
very worried about our polarized politics and what the future will bring, since
I’m certain we will have a Senate rule change that will usher in more extreme
judges in the future," she continued.
McCaskill's
announcement came one day after fellow moderate Democratic Sens. Heidi Heitkamp
of North Dakota and Joe Manchin of West Virginia announced they would support
Gorsuch's nomination and vote in favor of the judge.
That brought
the total number of votes to confirm Gorsuch to 54. But with Democratic leaders
almost certainly set to enact a filibuster, Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell will likely have to invoke the "nuclear" option and rewrite
the Senate rules to kill the filibuster on Supreme Court nominees for Gorsuch
to be confirmed. It's an option McConnell has previously expressed little
desire to do.
To reach 60
votes, McCaskill was key. Along with Sen. Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Sen. Bill
Nelson of Florida, and Sen. Jon Tester of Montana — all of whom hail from
states carried by Trump in last year's election — McCaskill was viewed as a
necessity in order to obtain the necessary votes to crush a filibuster.
*BI*
0 Comments