It is no
longer an exaggeration that there is hardly any major sector of the economy
that the Federal Government of Nigeria does not have its feet deep in debt,
most of 
which are long outstanding. If it is not road contractors today complaining of non-payment of huge financial claims on the government, it will be another group of private sector economic agents. And the number of such complaints keeps increasing despite series of reported remedial meetings and even promises made by government to settle its indebtedness. The other day, the nation was alerted by the downstream oil marketers that the Federal Government was indebted to them to the tune of a whopping N800 billion. The amount, according to the report, is made up of money the marketers spent to finance importation of petrol (PMS) plus bank interest charges that had accumulated from the banks. Although the principal amount borrowed and accumulated interests were not separated, the marketers further claimed that as a result of government’s debts to them, they in turn, have been unable to repay to their bankers’ debts amounting to USD1.2 billion.
which are long outstanding. If it is not road contractors today complaining of non-payment of huge financial claims on the government, it will be another group of private sector economic agents. And the number of such complaints keeps increasing despite series of reported remedial meetings and even promises made by government to settle its indebtedness. The other day, the nation was alerted by the downstream oil marketers that the Federal Government was indebted to them to the tune of a whopping N800 billion. The amount, according to the report, is made up of money the marketers spent to finance importation of petrol (PMS) plus bank interest charges that had accumulated from the banks. Although the principal amount borrowed and accumulated interests were not separated, the marketers further claimed that as a result of government’s debts to them, they in turn, have been unable to repay to their bankers’ debts amounting to USD1.2 billion.
This is
pathetic. Indeed, it is distasteful that the government is leading by bad
example in settling corporate financial commitments. This has given rise to
some persons using the government’s attitude as excuses to justify non-payment
of their debts to others. That is why, these days, ‘if the Federal Government
owes some people, who am I not to owe somebody?’ has become an anthem for
shameless citizens and ‘if the government, with all the billions of dollars it
earns, is unable to settle its debts, why should my creditors expect me to pay
them?’ This ugly development is bound to complicate settlement of legitimate
financial commitments by parties in the country. For instance, if the
government cannot pay its creditors and such creditors cannot, in turn, pay
what they owe the banks, the ultimate burden bearers will be persons who had
deposited their money in banks. For as long as banks’ debtors are unable to pay
their debts, the banks risk being unable to meet their depositors’ repayment
demands. If such a situation is prolonged for a period of time without
commensurate inflow of fresh deposits into the banks, the country may
back-pedal to the era of banks’ distress and failures, with the very familiar
unpalatable experiences. Indeed, if deposit-run on banks is triggered, the
expectations that the country will soon exit from recession will be a mirage.
As the
marketers clearly pointed out, continued government’s delay in paying the debts
will adversely affect their businesses with side effects of employee lay-offs,
fuel shortages, a return to long queues at fuel stations, mounting bank
interest charges and even eventual closure of some of the businesses, among
others.
There is
nothing wrong in government being in debt, but the greatest damage it can
impose on itself is to allow the debts to be classified as bad. That will
impact negatively on its integrity, image and credit rating. In other climes, a
bad debtor will find it difficult, if not impossible, to access credit
facilities in future. The Federal Government, no doubt, is aware of this and
that is why its agent, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), initiated its
internal Credit Risk Management System (CRMS) and private sector-owned Credit
Bureau to keep tap on the credit behaviour of bank debtors and to check-mate
serial bad debtors from causing havoc in the system. It is hypocritical of the
government to be supporting the tightening of noose around the neck of bad
debtors in the banking system while it is not paying its own creditors. Today,
if a credit risk assessment is conducted on the government it will most
probably turn in a result that government is the biggest and perhaps, worst
debtor in the same system. Thus, its debts could be acquired at huge discounts
by Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) to smoothen the books of the
banks. By extension, if any of the debts of the oil marketers becomes so bad
that it has to be acquired by AMCON, it is an indirect way of government’s own
debts being subjected to acquisition by AMCON. This type of situation will
create hazards.
To avoid
creating or exacerbating problems in the economy and to aid its recovery from
recession, the Federal Government should commence, without further delay,
settlement of its indebtedness to its various creditors. No one says government
must repay all of its debts in one lump sum. Properly planned and scheduled,
the debts, across board, can be drastically reduced without further agitations
by the creditors and exposure of the economy to preventable dangers.
All
creditors’ claims on government should be properly verified before settlement.
Verifications should start from confirming the existence, genuineness and
validity of contracts. Successful execution in accordance with predetermined
terms and that payment had not previously been made, should also be verified.
Anything short of proper verification may lead the government into the trap of
corruption.
It is good
news that the oil marketers met with the Acting President Yemi Osinbajo on
their plight and that the Minister of Finance, had been directed to ‘‘solve the
problem.’’ With that Executive directive, it is expected that the minister will
act fast, recognising the implications of further delay on the country’s
socio-economic situation. Finally, as government fast-tracks and resolves its
debts that have become subject of complaints, it must strive hard to avoid a
repeat of this embarrassment.
Guardian
Guardian
 
 
0 Comments