There was
confusion at the Federal High Court, Abuja yesterday as Justice Okon Abang
insisted that both former President Goodluck Jonathan and former National
Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd) must appear before it tomorrow.
The two are
expected to give evidence as defence witnesses in the ongoing trial of former
National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Olisa
Metuh, in a N400 million corruption charges levelled against him by the Federal
Government.
Justice
Abang had signed a subpoena drafted by Metuh’s legal team, praying the court to
compel Jonathan to appear as defence witness in the case.
The trial
judge had indicated in the subpoena that the former president should appear in
court on Wednesday.
Earlier on
Monday, the judge had also subpoenaed Dasuki to appear on the same Wednesday,
but his counsel, Ahmed Raji (SAN), opposed the invitation on the ground that
his client was still in detention.
It is not
clear if the former president will appear in court today, especially as the
registrar had confirmed in the open court that Jonathan had not been served
notice by the bailiff. The court will deliver ruling on a motion filed by the
ex-NSA seeking to set aside the subpoena issued against him to compel his
appearance in court.
Justice
Abang maintained that the ruling he earlier gave on Monday concerning Dasuki’s
appearance in court today still subsists.
At the
resumed sitting yesterday, Dasuki, through his counsel, Raji prayed the court
to set aside the subpoena issued against his client on the ground that Dasuki
has been in the custody of the Department of State Service (DSS) since
September 2015 without a lawful court order.
While
arguing Monday’s application, Raji stated that the ex-NSA was not in the right
frame of mind to testify in any matter, having been denied access to documents
and freedom of movement for almost two years by the Federal Government.
The counsel
further submitted that Dasuki, having been indicted alongside Metuh in the same
financial transactions, is not a compellable witness that should testify in
such a criminal trial. He, therefore, urged the court to set aside the subpoena
against his client on account of improper service of the same on him and in
view of the canvassed reasons.
But counsel
to Metuh, Dr. Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), opposed the motion by Dasuki on the ground
that he is bound by the order of court to come and give evidence in the trial.
He expressed
regret that he had written letters to Dasuki and the director general of DSS,
on the need to produce Dasuki in court for the purpose of giving evidence but
that up till yesterday, the DSS had not considered it necessary to respond to
the letters.
The counsel
to the Federal Government, Sylvanus Tahir, opposed the application by Dasuki,
raising four grounds for considerations.
They include
the fact that the Federal High Court is a subordinate court to the Court of
Appeal and as such, cannot review, vary or set aside a judgement of the Court
of Appeal.
Tahir
claimed that the judgement of the appellate court on subpoena issued against
Dasuki was valid, subsisting and not appealed against and that Dasuki, not
being a party at the appeal court, cannot challenge the decision of the
appellate court.
The EFCC
counsel further argued that the judgement of the Appeal Court has a binding
effect on all parties, and consequently urged the court to refuse the
application by Dasuki, seeking to set aside the judgement of the higher court
delivered on September 29.
Tahir
further submitted that nothing precludes Dasuki from coming to court to testify
even if he had been indicted in the same financial transaction along with
Metuh.
After taking
submissions from the parties, Justice Abang adjourned ruling till today.
He ordered
lawyers on the matter to supply to the court the photocopies of authorities
cited to buttress their submissions during their oral arguments.
He added
that since the order of the court made on Monday has not been vacated, both
former President Jonathan and Dasuki who were called by Metuh to testify, must
be in court today.
0 Comments