*Motion
sponsor absent, reappears after adjournment
• Governor
Udom seeks review of NEC’s approval
• Ogoni
cleanup also deserves priority, say activists
Senators
yesterday expressed disappointment over the failure by the leadership of the
Senate to open a debate on the contentious plan by government to withdraw $1
billion
from the Excess Crude Account to fund its war against insurgency in the
North East.
Senate
President Bukola Saraki had an uphill task trying to persuade his colleagues
the matter should be debated upon resumption from the Christmas and New Year
recess. His appeals were repeatedly rejected as lawmakers voiced their
disapproval.
Trouble
started when Deputy President Ike Ekweremadu drew attention to the fact that
yesterday’s Senate Order Paper was silent on the matter despite the fact that
the upper legislative chamber had on Wednesday agreed to debate it yesterday.
Senator Sam
Anyanwu (PDP, Imo State) had on Wednesday notified his colleagues that the
planned withdrawal was a matter of urgent national importance, demanding
serious examination by the chamber. He had therefore asked the Senate to allow
him sponsor a motion for a debate the following day yesterday.
Shortly
after Ekweremadu raised the issue, many of his colleagues became agitated and
sought a positive response from Saraki, who noticing the mood of the chamber
painstakingly explained why the motion could not be taken.Saraki did not
explain why the motion was not on the Order Paper, but stated that Anyanwu’s
absence from the chamber made it difficult for the debate to commence.
His
explanation, however, failed to pacify the chamber, as the murmurs intensified.
Following this, he lightheartedly remarked that his political party would not
agree that money be spent without due process, and assured that a debate would
be opened immediately the Senate returns from the holiday.”This matter should
have come up today (yesterday) but Senator Sam Anyanwu was not able to present
his paper today. He sought more time and I agreed with him that it will be
taken care of in the next legislative day,” Saraki said to jeers and laughter
by senators.
“Our party
does not do things like that. We will not spend money that does not follow due
process. I am assuring you that that money will not be spent until we come back
here and debate it,” he added.But shortly after the Senate adjourned till
January 16, 2018, Anyanwu resurfaced for a committee meeting without muttering
a word on why he stayed away from the chamber to present his motion.
The proposed
anti-insurgency fund drew criticism from the Akwa Ibom State governor, Mr.
Emmanuel Udom, yesterday. He faulted its approval by the National Economic
Council, asking why such a huge amount had not been made to address insecurity
in the Niger Delta. The governor also contended that he was not at the meeting
where the decision was taken.
“We are not
too comfortable with the decision to part with $1 billion that is supposed to
support development by states and local government areas. I am not speaking for
anybody. I am speaking for myself. As at today, I am being owed almost N140
billion on federal roads. I have generated electricity and sold it to the
national grid and I have not been paid for it.
“So, when we
are discussing security, it’s not just one aspect. Let’s look at it in a
holistic manner; what actually constitute security threats to the whole
country,” he told journalists at the Ibom International Airport. Udom noted
that since some governors especially those from the South South region were not
at the meeting, there was the need for a review of the matter.
Environmental
activists in the Niger Delta meanwhile have described the delay in the release
of funds for the cleanup of Ogoniland as insensitive. Speaking under the aegis
of the Civil Society for Environment Sustainability (CISOC), they decried the
approval given to the Federal Government to spend $1 billion on terrorism while
the cleanup remained neglected.
The group’s
chairman, Mr. Young Kigbara, said it was frustrating living in a country of
double standards where authorities react to issues on the basis of sectional or
primordial sentiments.
“We are
afraid and saddened that this laudable intent (cleanup) of the Federal
Government might be undermined by apparent non-existence of any sense of
urgency and the relapse into needless inertia of relevant agencies of
government, particularly the Ministries of Environment on the release of funds
for earnest takeoff of the project,” he said at the end of the group’s
emergency meeting in Port Harcourt.
He added:
“We call, therefore, on the Federal Government, in the spirit of the urgency of
the situation, to direct the immediate release of funds to the Hydrocarbon
Pollution Remediation Project (HYPREP) for quick action on the implementation
of emergency measures.”
0 Comments