Foreign diplomats
and some local economic experts have expressed fears that the current economic
recession in Nigeria may last till 2021 if urgent steps are not taken by the
Federal Government.
The diplomats, who
appraised the economic policies of the Muhammadu Buhari administration, said
the recession was triggered by the government’s three-pronged war on the Boko
Haram insurgents, militants in the Niger Delta and the anti-corruption crusade.
The diplomats from
some Asian countries asserted that the recession was heightened by what they
described as “the lack of clear economic plans” by the Buhari administration.
One of the High
Commissioners, who opted for anonymity to avoid any diplomatic row with
Nigeria, maintained that any war a country fights takes a huge toll on its
economy.
He said: “Some of us
were alarmed when President Buhari, who was struggling to fight Boko Haram and
the Niger Delta militants, chose to declare another front on corruption.
“From Vietnam to
Iraq to Afghanistan to Syria: no country fights a war without its economy
being the first casualty. In fact, the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
and Syria have cost the United States (US) taxpayers over $4.7 trillion; any
wonder the country’s economy is gasping for breath?
“In the case of
Nigeria, it is bad enough that you are fighting Boko Haram terrorists and
Niger Delta militants. Again, the government decided a third one which is the
war against corruption”.
The envoy said that
although “this is a low intensity ‘war’, but really speaking, it is a war against
the economy of the nation. It’s worse than a full scale conflict apart from the
absence of the cruel physical human impact.”
“The rhetoric from
your President and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was
enough to drive people under. Business owners and money moguls in the
financial sector have locked up. There is confusion in the land; nobody knows
who the EFCC will descend on next.”
Another envoy, who
shared the views of the economic experts, declared that a country that gets
four of its major banks’ managing directors locked up in one day and forced
them to cough out billions of naira to regain their freedom has shot itself in
the foot.
The experts had
condemned the detention of some bank chiefs for alleged corruption offences.
They said that “by that act you erode confidence in your banking sector both
from depositors’ point of view and from their foreign partners and
corresponding banks which usually lend them money for further lending locally.
“In our bid to fight
corruption, we declared a ‘war’,” one of them said, adding that, “We took the
war too far and tagged whoever has money in the country as corrupt. People
became afraid to invest money in the economy. Investors became wary. They
started moving their monies in droves. This put a strain on our national
reserves,” one of the economists said.
One of the envoys,
who did a cross-country analysis of the situation, said: “Don’t forget that
Nigeria is a Third World country where the financial sector is a bit
unregulated. People source funds both from the black markets and the
conventional markets to carry out their businesses. What is illegitimate in
developed countries like the US and the United Kingdom (UK) may not
necessarily be illegitimate here. These supposedly illegitimate windows are
the only ways people can use to even up with their foreign counterparts. But
now everyone started suspecting the other. The middle class to which the
working class depends locked up their vaults.”
The envoy also
agreed with the experts that the government’s decision to implement the
Treasury Single Account (TSA) at the time it was done was unwise.
He argued that it
made no economic sense to mop up all Federal Government’s funds in commercial
banks into a so-called TSA account at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
without concluding the scientific stress test recommended by former Finance
Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, under the Goodluck Jonathan’s government.
To the experts, TSA
has caused more economic stagnation than solve its intended purpose of
curbing corruption.
One of the experts
said: “We make grave mistakes by equating ourselves to the standards of the
West. Unfortunately, even in the western world they consciously lower the
standards for their senior citizens and for those who create employment for
their citizens.
“Today, there is
palpable fear in the land. We are in a state of tension everywhere. Nobody
wants to say anything without fear of the EFCC visiting your bank to print out
your account statement and invite you to make statements on flimsy
allegations,” another expert stated.
He said: “As we are
talking to you now, there is fear in the land. People don’t want to bring out
their money to spend. As a result, government revenues have dwindled in terms
of taxes and import duties. Go to the Customs. This is probably the worst
period in the history of the agency. Nobody is importing anything. Everybody
who has money is scrambling to hide it.”
A financial analyst,
who also opted for anonymity, said that “fighting corruption is good. But
corruption could be fought without making it a national priority and
sloganeering it. There is nowhere in the world where there is no corruption. In
fact, in some countries, the situation is worse than Nigeria. The best
approach is to put systems in place that prevent corruption itself rather than
creating panic in the polity.
“Sloganeering is a
very bad thing for a country. Slogans like war against corruption only breed
more corruption. War against indiscipline only breeds more indiscipline. In
fact, there is a salient feeling in the security circle, that every law
creates a loophole for exploitation by those implementing it. This is now the
case as the anti-corruption agencies have exploited the so-called war against
corruption and created undue advantage for themselves.”
On the way out, both
the envoys and economists agreed that Nigeria is really in bad shape. One of
them said that the way out is for the President to declare a general amnesty
for the so-called corrupt and encourage them to start spending locally to
boost economic activities and to fight corruption in a decent way without
necessarily declaring a war.
The others added
that, “In some countries, they try to ask those who got illicit money to
reinvest it in the local economy as a way of getting amnesty. This is the way
to go,” he said.
In his conclusion,
one of the envoys said: “As it stands now, even with the best of intentions and
the best of policies, Nigeria’s recovery is five years down the line. In other
words, Nigeria can only recover if the right policies and methodical
implementation are put in place in the next five years.”
Follow Solenzo Blog on




0 Comments