Autonomous
vehicles hold great promise to remake our society and economy, but not everyone
is along for the ride. There are, of course, the concerns about industries that
self-driving cars will disrupt and the people they will put
out of work. Skeptics like Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson have suggested we might
be better off if the government were to stop this transition from happening at
all, as “nothing is more American than driving.”
The evidence
actually points in the opposite direction. Self-driving cars may be so much
safer — eliminating most of the 94
percent of motor-vehicle accidents that are due to driver error — that
it won’t be long until we have to ponder the previously unthinkable: banning
human-piloted vehicles from the road.
While we
still are years away from large-scale deployment, self-driving cars are making
their way into select cities and testing centers throughout
the United States, as state and federal policymakers
experiment with how to regulate them. In addition to saving lives and
preventing crippling injuries, the adoption of autonomous vehicles promises
hundreds of billions in
savings on fuel, reduced property damage and increased productivity
during our daily commutes.
But today’s
human-operated vehicles soon will be more than just obsolete. Because of their
inability to integrate with traffic safely, they’ll be a hazard to others on
the road. Automation proponent Elon Musk is among those now arguing we may soon
“outlaw
driving cars because it’s too dangerous.”
At the very
least, it will almost certainly be necessary to prohibit them from certain
areas, just as we don’t let people ride horses on a major freeway. At the end
of the day, imposing some new restrictions on human-operated vehicles may
simply be unavoidable.
It’s not
hard to imagine the benefits of having areas dedicated exclusively to automated
vehicles. Removing human error from the equation would extend safety benefits
to everyone. Traffic efficiency would improve, as automated vehicles coordinate
their operations, either through vehicle-to-vehicle or
vehicle-to-infrastructure communication systems, or through decentralized apps.
Our commutes, which
currently average 25 minutes each way, will become shorter and less stressful.
Most analysts expect the self-driving future will be one in which fewer people
will own cars or need parking spaces for those cars, as fleets of ridesharing
services fill our commuting needs. That means our infrastructure needs would
diminish massively.
The
human-operated cars of the future could be an anachronism that we simply have
to accommodate, like Amish horse-drawn carriages. But it’s probably not slated
to be an activity of the past. Just like horses, which arestill
legal on many American roads, there are many reasons human-operated
cars won’t be banned outright.
The
political costs of an outright ban would be prohibitive, at least over the near
term. Americans also use their cars for more than just commuting. We buy muscle
cars to gun for potential
glory between traffic signals, and sport utility vehicles so we can
take spontaneous off-road weekend adventures.
Moreover,
spurred by ever-improving reliability, the average car on America’s roads is
now more
than 11 years old. The length of financing periods for vehicles also
continues to grow longer; last year, it was nearly
70 months. That means Americans who buy cars today are making long-term
commitments — both to use them for a long time and to be paying for them for a
long time.
An outright
ban also may not be necessary. Even Amish buggies now include many safety
features that weren’t present in their original designs, including modern
brakes, lights and electrical systems. In the same way, many of the technologies
that promote safety in autonomous vehicles can be — and already are being —
applied to human-operated cars.
A study by
the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has found these collision-avoidance
systems to be effective at reducing the number and severity of accidents,
estimating that current technology can prevent one
out of three fatal crashes. As these systems get better and sophisticated
sensors become more ubiquitous, they will rapidly approach the safety of fully
autonomous vehicles.
But we also
should expect to see the creation of zones in which traditionally operated
vehicles are restricted, perhaps concentrated in urban areas with heavy traffic
like San Francisco or Manhattan. As a first step, traffic planners could look
to tackle high-congestion zones by assessing tolls on human-operated vehicles,
from which automated vehicles would be exempt. Over time, such zones would
expand to roads limited to self-driving vehicles only.
It might
even make sense to establish “park and ride” arrangements similar to those
already popular today, where drivers would leave their human-piloted cars and
hop in a self-driving vehicle.
With the
labor cost of drivers largely factored out of the mix, ridesharing services
would become much cheaper. It might also be the case that traditionally
operated vehicles outfitted with self-driving systems would be able to
integrate with “automated only” zones, in the way that Tesla owners can engage
the autopilot function.
Regardless
of how limits are applied, there will continue to be places for traditionally
operated vehicles to operate for the foreseeable future. Be it driving through
poorly mapped areas, off-road excursions or driving purely for pleasure,
human-operated vehicles will persist, despite their shortcomings in safety,
efficiency and environmental impact.
Automated
vehicles don’t have to mean the end of the golden age of driving in America.
Driven vehicles might even experience greater freedom once they are relieved of
the presence of thousands of other inattentively operated human vehicles, not
to mention all the congestion that comes with them. In exchange for giving up
certain areas of exclusive automated operation, the rest of the roads will open
up for those with an intense preference to drive. That’s not a bad trade.
READ MORE

0 Comments