BEIJING/BEDMINSTER,
N.J. (Reuters) - China should remain neutral if North Korea launches an attack
that threatens the United States, a Chinese state-run newspaper said
on Friday,
sounding a warning for Pyongyang over its plans to fire missiles near the U.S.
Pacific territory of Guam.
The comments
from the influential Global Times came after U.S. President Donald Trump
stepped up his rhetoric against North Korea again on Thursday, saying his
earlier threat to unleash "fire and fury" on Pyongyang if it launched
an attack may not have been tough enough.
China, North
Korea's most important ally and trading partner, has reiterated calls for calm
during the current crisis. Beijing has expressed frustration with both
Pyongyang's repeated nuclear and missile tests and with behavior from South
Korea and the United States, such as military drills, that it sees as
escalating tensions.
"China
should also make clear that if North Korea launches missiles that threaten U.S.
soil first and the U.S. retaliates, China will stay neutral," the Global
Times, which is widely read but does not represent government policy, said in
an editorial.
"If the
U.S. and South Korea carry out strikes and try to overthrow the North Korean
regime and change the political pattern of the Korean Peninsula, China will
prevent them from doing so," it said.
North
Korea's state-run KCNA news agency said on Thursday its army would complete
plans in mid-August to fire four intermediate-range missiles over Japan to land
near Guam.
Trump said
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was not going to get away with his
"horrific" comments and disrespecting America.
"Let's
see what he does with Guam. He does something in Guam, it will be an event the
likes of which nobody's seen before, what will happen in North Korea,"
Trump told reporters in New Jersey, without offering specifics.
Shortly
after Trump spoke, U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis told reporters the
United States still preferred a diplomatic approach to the North Korean threat
and that a war would be "catastrophic".
0 Comments